This letter comes from a doctoral student and professor in a seminary in Spain.
Question:
All other things being equal, we ought to accept the hypothesis which best explains what we observe.
A social scientist writes, “I just read an article in Public Interest in which the philosopher Edward Feser says Thomists ‘deny there will be non-human animals in heaven.’ Now, I understand the argument that animals on earth won't be resurrected in heaven. But he seems to be saying more.”
One of the readers of this blog asks a good question about last week’s post, “Why Can’t Johnnie Reason?”:
Postmodernist Essay Generator
In yesterday’s post I decoded the convoluted remark by a defender of dishonest journalism that “to let fact checking define the narrative would be a huge mistake.”
I’m breaking my “Monday for students” rule again. This letter is from an attorney in Jamaica.
Query:
Why is it that we humans find nothing wrong in defying physical laws, for example by flying, yet we do consider it wrong for us to defy moral laws? Just thinking.
Friedrich Nietzsche, the philosopher of will to power who originated the motto “God is dead,” wrote, "I think of myself as the scrawl which an unknown power scribbles across a sheet of paper, to try out a new pen" (letter to Peter Gast, August, 1881).
“Ten million young women rose to their feet with the cry, ‘We will not be dictated to,’ and went off and became stenographers.”
-- G.K. Chesterton
Tomorrow: A Word to the Wise